No Cameras In Big IP Case

[Ginny LaRoe]

File this under completely predictable developments. Apple v. Samsung will not be videotaped.

The patent suit over smartphones and tablet computers was a candidate for the Northern District of California's camera pilot program. A media outlet had requested taping the case, which is set for trial July 30. And U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh was willing to preside before the cameras.

But just like every other time a case was up for taping, a party to the suit balked, so no audience outside of the San Jose courtroom will get to see the trial.

A note that hit the docket late Tuesday does not disclose which side, or if both parties, opposed having cameras in court.

 

Comments

[microscope cameras]

A observe that hit the docket overdue Wednesday does not reveal which side, or if both events, compared having camcorders in court.

[Adidas Original Shoes]

Adidas Running Shoes presents all the possible features of this type of shoe from the materials it is made with, to the technologies that make it a top quality running shoe.

[Nike Brand Shoes]

Me Glaze! I will have to try your"totally life changing experience" at Guy Savoy. John

[Toronto Car Accident Lawyer]

I doubt that neither Apple nor Samsung was willing to have this case videotaped. What do they have to gain? I can think of a lot that they have to lose.

[OBEY Snapback]

just like every other time a case was up for taping, a party to the suit balked.

[cheap uggs boots]

in America lost 18 percent to 4.2 million, and the Episcopal Church lost 15 percent of its adherents to 1.95 million.Evangelical protestant congregations continued to grow, though slowly, to 50 million adherents.

[Beats By Dre australia]

This was a place where the rate of infection amongst stable couples was greater than that of commercial

[mulberry bayswater bags]

everything can be taken from a man but one thing; the freedom to choose his attitude in any given set of circumstances.