Become a Fan

twitter / LegalPadblog

LAWJOBS.COM S.F. BAY AREA JOB LISTINGS

« CJA to Ask Members About Opinion on Trial Court Rights Act | Main | Avoiding Your 'That's Not How We Used to Do It' Moment »

March 16, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d052253ef0147e34381d8970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Voters OK With Cuts to Courts:

Comments

THE KAT

Wait until the public stops the blind faith adherence to the "rule of law". California judiciary you have what the middle east dictators didn't have i.e. a ten maybe fifteen year notice that people will take to the street for justice and not the "rule of law". Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?
Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4)

SL

It always sounds like a good idea to make cuts to the court system. The problem is so few people are actually familiar with, or have an understanding of how the system works (let alone the Constitution).

The most frustrating thing that I see with cut backs in the court system is, that judges are shifting costs to the defendants (I'm a criminal defense attorney). For example, in Washington State our speedy trial rule has all but been gutted. Prosecutors are no longer held to a strict time line. I recently have had a case continued on two separate trial dates, because the prosecutor was not ready. Mind you this is a misdemeanor case with a two page report. But everyone seems to think that this behavior is okay, because of cut backs.

The point is not to complain about that (at least here), but to show how these cut backs are actually just shifting costs to the Defendants. We cannot let this continue to happen.

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • lawjobs
    Search For Jobs

    Job Type

    Region

    Keyword (optional)

February 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28