twitter / LegalPadblog
twitter / CapitalAccounts
twitter / Amanda Royal


Powered by Rollyo

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad


LAWJOBS.COM S.F. BAY AREA JOB LISTINGS

« Election Lawyers: Like Farmers Who Get Along | Main | S.E.C. Busts Mark Cuban for Inside Trade »

November 14, 2008

Is Blogging Supposed to Make You Sad?

Heller-logo

Well, this is depressing.

The San Francisco Chronicle’s Web site has just put up a nifty little workday distraction/paranoia tool: You can search which California companies have recently reported massive layoffs to the state, and how many employees were supposedly affected.

We only found one law firm (Heller) on there — and it puts a hard number on the human impact that firm’s dissolution is having in San Francisco, L.A., Menlo Park and San Diego: 682 employees.

(We might, in fact, be underselling the impact, because we’re not sure if that number includes partners, who we're guessing might not be considered “employees.” The state's WARN provisions don't shed much light on that scenario, and unfortunately, the state's Employment Development Department tells us that Heller didn't happen to break its stats down by job title, which is optional.)

If you want to search for other companies that have laid people off, recently or not so recently, you can check out the state’s more complete database going back almost six years here. We took a quick look at Brobeck in 2003 (.pdf), the year it dissolved: 815 employees, in five cities. Skjerven Morrill, the same year: 116, in two cities.

—  Pam Smith

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d052253ef010535f0179e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is Blogging Supposed to Make You Sad?:

Comments

Why would Heller bother to report to the state under the WARN Act if the firm did not intend to comply with the meaningful obligations (like observing the 60-day notice period or severance in lieu)? Also, Heller should notify the state that the layoff date is incorrect -- the reported date is 11/28, which is the date that complies with WARN's 60-day notice provision, while most employees were actually laid off on 10/10 and 10/17.

you want to be depressed, read

http://endofesq.com/?p=542

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

  • An Affiliate of the Law.com Network

    From the Law.com Newswire

    Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
    View a Sample


  • lawjobs
    Search For Jobs

    Job Type

    Region

    Keyword (optional)